![]() ![]() Additionally, I am going to use only 2 response rates in my examples, 20% and 80%, I am not going to over complicate things by trying to factor in the reality of variances in the dates of response to each InMail, and I am rounding all numbers, which can make some of the smaller numbers on the charts look odd, but you’ll get the point. Recruiter Professional Services = 100 (up from 50)įor the sake of simplicity, I am going to use 50 InMails per month to demonstrate the old InMail policy, and 100 InMails per month to demonstrate the new InMail policy.However, if you can figure out how to get a much higher than average rate of response, you can actually end up with more InMails under LinkedIn’s new policy than the old.ĭepending on your account type, you will get a different amount of monthly InMails, with some accounts receiving large increases: ![]() ![]() Of course, even for folks with ridiculously effective messaging, there are a number of reasons why it is practically impossible to get a 100% response rate (e.g., people respond via email instead of through LinkedIn, people not logging into LinkedIn for long periods of time, people simply ignoring InMails, etc.). However, their new policy does open up the possibility of unlimited InMails, provided you can achieve a 100% response rate. If you have a premium account with LinkedIn and haven’t been living under a rock, you are aware of LinkedIn’s InMail policy change which will, for most people, reduce the total number of InMails they are able to send. What does LinkedIn’s new InMail policy mean for you? That depends on how effective your InMails are and the response rates you can achieve. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |